Digitisation publications
This folder holds the following references to publications, sorted by year and author.
There are 14 references in this bibliography folder.
Brecko, J and Mathys, A
(2020).
Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging$~$of$~$natural history collections
European Journal of Taxonomy(623).
Mathys, A, Jadinon, R, and Hallot, P
(2019).
EXPLOITING 3D MULTISPECTRAL TEXTURE FOR A BETTER FEATURE IDENTIFICATION FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE
ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, IV-2/W6:91-97.
Mathys, A, Semal, P, Brecko, J, and Van den Spiegel, D
(2019).
Improving 3D photogrammetry models through spectral imaging: Tooth enamel as a case study
PLoS One, 14(8):e0220949.
Brecko, J, Mathys, A, Dekoninck, W, De Ceukelaire, M, VandenSpiegel, D, and Semal, P
(2016).
Revealing Invisible Beauty, Ultra Detailed: The Influence of Low Cost UV Exposure on Natural History Specimens in 2D+ Digitization
PLOS ONE, 11(8):e0161572.
Mathys, A, Brecko, J, Van den Spiegel, D, and Semal, P
(2015).
3D and Challenging Materials: Guidelines for Different 3D Digitisation Methods for Museum Collections with Varying Material Optical Properties.
In: Proceedings of the 2nd international Congress on Digital Heritage 2015, Granada.
Mathys, A, Brecko, J, Van den Spiegel, D, Cammaert, L, and Semal, P
(2015).
Bringing Collections to the Digital Era: 3 Examples of Integrated High Resolution Digitisations Projects
In: Proceedings of the Digital Heritage 2015, pp. 1-4.
Brecko, J, Mathys, A, Dekoninck, W, Leponce, M, VandenSpiegel, D, and Semal, P
(2014).
Focus Stacking: a low budget semi-automated approach allowing high quality mass digitization.
In: Symposium "Entomology in Belgium 2014", Royal Belgian Entomological Society, Brussels, pp. 24.
Brecko, JA, Mathys, A, Dekoninck, W, Leponce, M, Vanden Spiegel, D, and Semal, P
(2014).
Image stacking: a semi-automated approach allowing high quality mass digitization
In: Digital Specimen 2014, Berlin.
Mathys, A, Brecko, J, and Semal, P
(2014).
Cost Evaluation of 3D Digitisation Techniques
In: 3D/4D Documentation in Cultural Heritage, ed. by Loannides M., Magnenat-Thalman N., Fink E., Yen A. & Quak E., pp. 17-25, EuroMed 2014, Digital Heritage: Progress in Cultural Heritage, Documentation, Preservation and Protection.
Mathys, A, Brecko, J, and Semal, P
(2013).
Comparing 3D digitizing technologies: what are the differences?
In: Proceedings of the 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress, ed. by Alonzo C. Addison, Gabriele Guidi, Livio De Luca, Sofia Pescarin, vol. Volume 1, pp. 201-204, 19th Intʼl VSMM, 10th Eurographics GCH, & 2nd UNESCO Memory of the World Conferences, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (ISBN: 978-1-4799-3169-9).
Mathys, A, Brecko, J, Di Modica, K, Abrams, G, Bonjean, D, and Semal, P
(2013).
Agora 3D. Low cost 3D imaging: a first look for field archaeology.
Notae Praehistoricae, 33/2013:33-42.
Mathys, A, Lemaitre, S, Brecko, J, and Semal, P
(2013).
Agora 3D: evaluating 3D imaging technology for the research, conservation and display of museum collections
Antiquity, 87(336).
Slizewski, A, Friess, M, and Semal, P
(2010).
Surface scanning of anthropological specimens: nominal-actual comparison with low cost laser scanner and high end fringe light projection surface scanning systems.
Quartär Yearbook for Ice Age and Stone Age Research, 57:179-187.
Slizewski, A and Semal, P
(2009).
Experiences with low and high cost 3D surface scanner.
Quartär Yearbook for Ice Age and Stone Age Research, 56:131-138.
Document Actions